<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Implant Ninja | Rana | Favorites</title>
	<link>https://implantninjadojo.com/members/rana7alkhalaf/activity/favorites/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://implantninjadojo.com/members/rana7alkhalaf/activity/favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed of Rana's saved posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 02:34:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.15.3</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca9f5f98e5d3700852b7696712a06d11</guid>
				<title>Dr. started the discussion #13 implant in the forum Implant Tx Planning</title>
				<link>https://implantninjadojo.com/forums/topic/13-implant/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:40:43 -0700</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://implantninjadojo.com/forums/topic/13-implant/">#13 implant</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi everyone.  The virtually planned implant #13 (3.8x12mm BH tapered pro) is considerably more submerged vs #12 implant (about 4mm difference).  Would there be any serious long term issues with this large discrepancy between adjacent implant platforms?  My initial thought is to GBR the buccal first so it would &#8220;fatten up&#8221; the thin crestal&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2732"><a href="https://implantninjadojo.com/forums/topic/13-implant/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		